Archive for Literature

I will palm your polemicsz

From Manifestoes: Provocations of the Modern by Janet Lyon.

. . . the manifesto form has much to teach us about the problems of modernity: while it may be best known as the no-nonsense genre of plain speech, the genre that shoots from the hip, it is in fact a complex, ideologically inflected genre that has helped to create modern public spheres. Its influence on the history of the modern West, though decisive, has been largely overlooked, perhaps precisely because its apparent rhetorical straightforwardness obscures the degree to which the form is embedded in the contradictions of political representation. On the one hand, the manifesto as we know it from the French Revolution forward is the liberatory genre the narrates in no uncertain terms the incongruous experiences of modernity of those whose needs have been ignored or excluded in a putatively democratic political culture. On the other hand, the manifesto is the genre not of universal liberation but of rigid hierarchical binaries . . . the manifesto participates ina reduced understanding of heterogenous social fields, creating audiences through a rhetoric of exclusivity, parceling out political identities across a polarized discursive field, claiming for “us” the moral high ground of revolutionary idealism, and constructing “them” as ideological tyrants, bankrupt usurpers, or corrupt fools. (3)

. . . the manifesto as a genre is constitutive of the public sphere to the degree that it persistently registers the contradictions within modern political life. For while modernity offers ideological assurances of autonomy and individualism within collectivity, it also and at the same time draws on the degferral of those promises. The manifesto records just this breach between modernity’s promissory notes and their payment. In order to understand how the manifesto has kept the records of modernity for the past three centuries, therefore, we must first reopen the historical record of democratic universalism in the west. (8)

Leave a comment »

Most Devoutly Desired Boons

Review of Jonathan L. Howard’s Johannes Cabal the Necromancer

Johannes Cabal the Necromancer

Wry wit, Faustian bargaining, and a wacky sense of the absurd are all elements of Jonathan L. Howard’s first novel, Johannes Cabal the Necromancer. The opening scene presents our discursive master of the dark arts, Johannes, on a journey into the nether realms of Hell. But far from gore and horror, Howard’s nine circles are filled with lightly-inflamed humor and the sense that everything is much smaller than it should be. Johannes must go through a bureaucratic system as frustrating as Kafka and as delightfully estranged as a Terry Gilliam before reaching the King of Pride himself, Satan. Satan, mind you, comes off a particularly silly cad, all the while enhanced with British vernacular and aroused anger. There is a bargain between our beloved necromancer and the worst demon, having something to do with a reclamation of a soul or two, and then a flash back to the world of the living.

Johannes tracks from one scene to the next recruiting minions at times (like his ghoulish brother Horst), and creating them at others (like Bones, an undead concoction made out of a bone and some hair and some skin—and unfortunately lacking any fat whatsoever). The goal is simple, but the environs are not: fantastical English countryside mixing industrial-age technology with medieval peasantry and poverty. You don’t really know when the story is taking place, but aren’t these stories supposed to be timeless anyway? Inevitably one thing is clear: this is a land of the traveling carnival, the carnival that shows up when it shows up and moves on to the next down when one has been exhausted.

The book’s small page count makes for an exciting read but hardly enough to leave the reader satisfied. There are many jumps in the plot that bring up questions where there did not have to be any; where some writers throw in side narratives, Howard approaches the idea minimally, instead incorporating some storytelling innovation through typography and lists. Characters too are damaged, often feeling rushed and worn at the same time. When we first meet Horst in the crypt of a wealthy family, he comes off as ravenous and abrasive; by the end of the book we notice he is nothing more than a sponge of soft emotion. Layla, a seductress made of Latex, is crucial to the pivot in action near the end of the story, but where did her presence ever come from? We never feel like the characters are that important, and this harkens to the wildfire style Howard provides. But for such an epic tale, why not give death a little more life?

Leave a comment »

You’re a Poltroon

“ACK” by Joy Williams

in Honored Guest (Vintage, 2005)

Review: THREE STARS

When you remember a story is good for just being good, isn’t that important enough? Get out there and read Joy Williams’ stories, even if it means they won’t stick.

“Hunters” by John Edgar Wideman

in God’s Gym (Mariner, 2006)

Review: TWO STARS

While this sociological heartbreak is a mild approach at the racism behind a group of whites raping a black, but the pacing and plot shifts force the story to fall flat on its face just after its initial haunting opening.

“A Radically Condensed History of Post-Industrial Life” & “Death is Not the End” by David Foster Wallace

in Brief Interviews with Hideous Men (Back Bay Books, 2000)

Review: FIVE STARS

The former story is a paragraph-long explanation on just about every relationship that can exist in this country; the latter is a rhythmic laugh-spree critique of poet laureates in the United States.

“Mnemonics” by Kurt Vonnegut

in Bagombo Snuff Box (Berkley Trade, 2000)

Review: FOUR STARS

To say I remember all of this story isn’t the point; the point is that if you want a cute story about distraction, memory, and secretaries, jump right in.

“The Shawl” by Cynthia Ozick

in Best American Short Stories of the Century (ed. John Updike) (Mariner, 2000)

Review: FOUR STARS

At the beginning of this yarn, a gaping wound that stinks of Eastern Europe’s charming poverties, you want the shawl to be a part of you. By the end you like the distance.

“The Ideal Village” by John Updike

in Trust Me (Ballantine, 1996)

Review: TWO STARS

It’s hard to hate on Updike, but this story doesn’t settle in any of the ways it begs to. The edges are torn up, and the characters aren’t fleshed.

“Erosion” by Ali Smith

in The Whole Story and Other Stories (Anchor, 2004)

Review: THREE STARS

It’s not difficult reading women writers who have guts; it’s just hard finding them. There’s nothing wrong with ant battles either.

“The Woman at the Gas Station” by Bernhard Schlink

in Flights of Love (trans. John E. Woods) (Vintage, 2002)

Review: ONE STAR

John E. Woods, what happened? Maybe it’s the plot’s fault—trying to take a surrealist approach to the most boring love story ever is fatal.

“The Farther You Go” by Richard Russo

in The Whores Child (Vintage, 2003)

Review: THREE STARS

I’ve always been fond of reading Russo’s Cheeveresque mouth-froth-laden stories, but it’s hard figuring out why middle aged conflict appeals so.

“May We Be Forgiven” by A. M. Holmes

in Best American Short Stories (ed. Salman Rushdie) (Mariner, 2008)

Review: FOUR STARS

Abandon: coincidence, convenience, understanding, smooth settings, known environments, all even trajectories. Get ready to be shocked, too.

Leave a comment »

To moue is to pout

At work I read short stories. Many of them. I try to keep it systematic: one story from one book and then move on to the next book. I made an exception the other day–I read two stories by David Foster Wallace. Exceptions must be made in such cases. When I get to Sixty Stories by Barthelme, I’ll probably read a couple instead of just one. Stories that are ultra short are ultra short for the same reason short poems are ultra short. But a good story often makes you want to read another good story in succession. Maybe poetry works the same way.

Anyway, here are some pouts of 140 characters (or less), reviewing said stories.

“Chekhov and Zulu” by Salman Rushdie

in East, West (Vintage, 1994)

Review:  THREE STARS

Star Trek-obsessed terrorists really know how to talk to audiences like they don’t exist. Just where does this story take place, and what is all the coded fuss saying?

“Entropy” by Thomas Pynchon

in Slow Learner: Early Stories (Back Bay Books, 1985)

Review: FOUR STARS

Replace the cute jazz pacifism of Kerouac with writing detective, harmful: a wallop noticeable more for the smeary aftermath than the slumped crack opening.

“The Fasting Artist” by Franza Kafka

in The Transformation and Other Stories (Penguin, 1995)

Review: TWO STARS

It’s still tough to find a good translation of this classic. Hunger doesn’t have to mean archaic language. Starvation doesn’t have to mean words let out to dry.

“The Sandbank Sage” by Jack Kerouac

in Atop an Underwood: Early Stories and Other Writings (Penguin, 2000)

Review: THREE STARS

To get to know the Beats is to read them before they were Beats. Kerouac’s early work is an obvious quest-leg toward bop-prosody, but he hasn’t found his voice yet.

“Remains of the Night” by John McNally

in Who Can Save Us Now? (Free Press, 2008)

Review: TWO STARS

If you want to read about a faux-superhero/villain dejection called the Silverfish, check out this witty, disgusting, and highly blasé tale told by the bug’s butler.

Leave a comment »

“Even in the absence of gods, his life, or dance, was always prayerful.”

marble

The difficulty in writing books about ideas, or problems, is usually in the delivery. How do you present your predicament–moral, spiritual, or otherwise–to the reader without coming off as dry or cowardly? How do you turn a riveting topic into more than just a proof? How do bring your ideas into fruition via an engaging narrative with characters whose liveliness you can trust or resent?

Australian Nobel Laureate Patrick White’s novel the Solid Mandala (Penguin 1966, 69) is a worthy attempt at the novel of ideas. Through its following of Waldo and Arthur Brown, dominance and sheeply minion personified, the book attempts to cover as many existential tracks as possible in its mere 316 pages. But ultimately it is no Magic Mountain or Death in Venice, no Crime and Punishment or Brothers Karamazov.

The book is divided into four main sections. The first section sets the scene’s social and cultural background. What is Australia like in the early 20th century? This is a world where misogyny runs rampant, women are trained to be afraid and care for little, and public transportation is more of a paradoxical necessity than a tool that is to be understood and loved. There is a hint throughout this short introductory block that the world White is painting for us, as realistic as Hemingway or Steinbeck, is also just as queasy in its farcical qualities. It’s a sad, haunting entrapment that ultimately leads to the demise at the end of the novel–but the astute enrapturing of, say, one of the Bronte sisters provides much more evidence that the book’s corners are worth the wait. White? He’s got a lot of cotton in his mouth and not necessarily anything he’s saying behind it is worth listening to.

In the second and third sections, White inspects the lives of two brothers, twins Waldo and Arthur Brown, who grow old together living in near-poverty on Terminus Road in some small town, Australia–the same town the women that are on the bus in the first section inhabit. Waldo is the logical, intellectual of the two; he knows philosophy and literature and the arts and is always in torment because of it or because of his brother’s attempt to follow the same path. Arthur, the bumbling half-wit, ultimately socializes better, lives better, and survives better than his struggling artist brother. Arthur is lead into honing his own creativity, which amounts to a significantly graceful presentation far more divine than any of Waldo’s essays, the novel reaches its height. But even when Arthur has succeeded in becoming the real treasure of the fraternal relationship, the novel is more disgusting and disheartening than any one really wants it to be. There is no magic, no pleasure. It is the Iceman Cometh without the alcoholism. It is a long train to nowhere that continues on in hopes of finding something that simply does not glitter by the end.

And the end? Back to Steinbeck. Back to Of Mice and Men. Ultimately the closer White gets to getting over the stone wall and finding the answers to his ideas, the higher the wall extends, revealing less about our tracked characters, showing us more about the cyclical nature of the world we live in. This is the problem of a book composed of problems. The narration is the greater focus but it is ultimately lacking, and thus the problems and all associated ideas get lost in the undercurrent as well.

Leave a comment »

What You Can Learn from Jack Spicer

jack-spicer

Image taken from here.

Choice Quotes from a Choice Text: 2008’s My Vocabulary Did This To Me

Everything posted below, taken straight out of Jack Spicer’s collected poems, My Vocabulary Did This To Me, which I read straight through from cover to cover last week, was chosen to be posted below because it’s very difficult to get a good judge of a book nowadays from the cover alone. Though it’s probably true that Spicer is popular enough in the university and underground lit-circles that many people will get exposed to him in one way or another, what about the skeptics? Read on, I say!

From After Lorca (1957)

“Some poems are easily laid. They will give themselves to anybody and anybody physically capable can receive them. They may be beautiful (we have both written some that were) but they are meretricious. From the moment of their conception they inform us in a dulcet voice that, thank you, they can take care of themselves. I swear that if one of them were hidden beneath my carpet, it would shout out and seduce somebody. The quiet poems are what I worry about–the ones that must be seduced. They could travel about with me for years and no one would notice them. And yet, properly wed, they are more beautiful than their whorish cousins.” (138)

“Loneliness is necessary for pure poetry.” (150)

“It was a game, I shout to myself. A game. There are no angels, ghosts, or even shadows. It was a game out of summer and freedom and a need for ap oetry that would be more than the expression of my hatreds and desires. It was a game like Yeats’ spooks or Blake’s sexless seraphim.” (153)

From Admonitions (1957)

“Muses do exist, but now I know that they are not afraid to dirty their hands with explication–that they are patient with truth and commentary as long as it doesn’t get into the poem, that they whisper (if you let yourself really hear them), “Talk all you want, baby, but then let’s go to bed.” (157)

“But what, you will be too polite to ask me, is the point? Are not these poems all things to all men, like Rorschach ink blots or whores? Are they anything better than a kind of mirror?” (157)

“Mirror makers know the secret–one does not make a mirror to resemble a person, one brings a person to the mirror.” (157)

“The trick naturally is what Duncan learned years ago and tried to teach us–to to search for the perfect poem but to let your way of writing of the moment go along its own paths, explore and retreat but never be fully realized (confined) within the boundaries of one poem. This is where we were wrong and he was right, but he complicated things for us by saying that there is no such thing as good or bad poetry. There is–but not in relation to the single poem. There is really no single poem.” (163)

“The poems belong nowhere.” (163)

“Poems should echo and re-echo against each other. They should create resonances. They cannot live alone any more than we can. (163)

From A Book of Music (1958)

“Poetry ends like a rope.” (178)

From Billy the Kid (1958)

“The word steals from the word, the sound from / the sound. Even / The very year of your life steals from the last one.” (192)

From Fifteen False Propositions Against God (1958)

“Even in a poem / One forgets the real world.) / Fuzzy heads of fuzzy people / Like the trees Williams saw. Drop / The words drop / Like leaves from a fuzzy tree” (197)

From Letters to James Alexander (1958-59)

“There are people that talk about poetry like tired insurance clerks talk about baseball. They must be destroyed by our silence. ven the hatred of them interrupts the conversation that our poems wish to continue. even the mention of them makes it me talking, crashes into paradox that was their truth.” (209)

From “A Textbook of Poetry” in The Heads of the Town up to the Aether (1960)

“Surrealism is the business of poets who cannot benefit by surrealism. It was the first appearance of the Logos that said, ‘The public be damned,’ by which he did not mean that they did not matter or he wanted to be crucified by them, but that really he did not have a word to say to them. This was surrealism.” (299)

“To be lost in a crowd. Of images, of metaphors (whatever they were), of words; this is a better surrender. Of the poet who is lost in the crowd of them. Finally.” (299)

“Or as if all our words without the things about them were meaningless.” (299)

“The wires dance in the wind of the noise our poems make. The noise without an audience. Because the poems were written for ghosts.” (300)

“The poet thinks continually of strategies, of how he can win out against the poem.” (301)

“All that we do in bed, or sleep, or sex is limited by this circle which can only be personally defined.” (303)

“On the outside of it is what everybody talks about. On the outisde of it are the dead that try to talk.” (303)

“Boredom is part of the Logos too.” (304)

“Every city that is formed colelcts its slums and the ghost of it. Every city that is formed collects its ghosts.” (305)

“The city redefined becomes a church. A movement of poetry. not merely a system of belief but their beliefs and their hearts living together.” (306)

“Surrealism is a poem more than this. The intention that things do not fit together.” (306)

“Magic, which is trying to hold onto people with your own hands, is funny while surrealism is not funny. There is a place where we can talk and we cannot talk. Both of us.” (309)

“To create the beautiful again. It is as if somehow the lovers of postage stamps had created an image of themselves. A red wheelbarrow or a blue image of the unknown. And each stamp we put on the letters they send us must be cancelled, heartlessly. As if its delivery, the beautiful image of it, were a metaphor.” (310)

“We are all alone and we do not need poetry to tell us how alone we are.” (311)

From Map Poems (1963-64)

“Love makes the discovery wisdom abandones.” (369)

From “Sporting Life” in Language (1963-95)

“The trouble with comparing a poet with a radio is that radios / don’t develop scar tissue.” (373)

So buy the book here.
spicer cov des8.indd
Or here.

Comments (1) »

More Poetry with Straight Lines

Book of My Nights

In Book of My Nights (Boa Editions, 2001), Chinese-American poet Li-Young Lee manages to reference “honey” at least three times. Other quirky references include: “fruit,” “birds,” “fabric,” “night,” and an almost symphonic release to various members of the immediate and extended family.

Family, love, marriage, brotherhood, and children are among the more emotionally potent figures that dominate the shards of inference throughout the book.

The bio note in the back of the book says that Li-Young works at a factory in Chicago. This was in 2001 when the book was released, and after minor research I have found not a single update on his life, so who knows if Li-Young still works there; however, the aside about the factory is actually helpful in understanding his poetry as a form of meditation and even a gentle but necessary escape from some vague, terrible monotony.

You don’t get much urban or machinery in any of these poems, which shows great discipline, and obvious influence from traditional Chinese/Japanese poets. Instead, you get a zeroing in on a form of salvation, important ties to some greater purpose, whether through “God,” or the ultimate aesthetic balance of nature:

The birds don’t alter space.
They reveal it. The sky
never fills with any
leftover flying. They leave
nothing to trace. It is our own
astonishment collects
in chill air. Be glad.

Each stammer is pleasantly collaborated on through visions of philosophic mystery . . .

How is he going to explain
the moon taken hostage, the sea
risen to fill up all the mirrors?

How is he going to explain the branches
beginning to grow from his ribs and throat,
the cries and trills starting in his own mouth?

. . . and ultimately surrealism that has operatic value in its potenty irrational complexity:

Someone’s separating
the white grains of his insomnia
from the black seeds
of his sleep.

Ultimately Li-Young’s book is a quick read but it gets the job done well. It’s a delightful romp through a “day-book,” or more appropriately, “night-book,” that is also subtly unpredictable in its dynamic range of styles. At times the work seems too simplistic, too quiet, but every approach in this book is not without purpose, and it’s purpose is not, surprisingly, simply to vent the insomnia or depression through verse. There is a higher element of peace overarching the pages that sets them in a gentle, smokey fire.

Leave a comment »

What are you reading these days?

Averno by Louise Gluck

Yesterday I read Louise Glück’s Averno, a pretty good sized book about Persephone. Try it out. There’d be a review if there was time.

Leave a comment »

On Reviews

I have found it excruciatingly difficult to review any of the fiction I have been reading since taking a more active conversation role with the communists. Quite unfortunate, but I have been reading nonetheless.

Lolita was great. A worthy follow-up to my Nabokovian introduction via the Defense. A compiled accordion of quotes I pulled from my dusty, old and tattered copy (analogous in many ways to Humbert Humbert, our dirty, old, and quite perverted protagonist narrator) can be found here.

I also read through, with agony and pleasure, Saul Bellow’s Herzog, a sprawling work based in Chicago, New York, and even Philadelphia. Who knows when and how that behemoth of mental treachery can be approached–with every day I think, I’m losing more and more of this. It’s a labyrinth I don’t know I should venture back into. But the summation is this: written in the late 50s, it’s a modern American writer’s response to the problem novels of Thomas Mann and the 19th C. Russians. Go humanism, go Romanticism and Enlightenment.

In other news, there were some cell phone poems recently posted and some work poems, based on a new and simple exercise that is both humbling and enough distraction from the trauma of working retail. See below for an abstract and link to more creative work.

In otherly news:

Free Zinn available for reading.

Speaking of free political texts?

Videos from the Dodge Poetry Festival–it’s like you are really there in one of the chairs dreaming about some pleasing verse, and where did the fashion sense of artists go?! Poets need to start acting like clowns and zigzags once in a while!

and PS: Winnie the who?

Two segments of recent creativity:

“Because it’s just not for”

In response to her mother,
who stood outside the bookstore,
looking at the palisade of red
romance novels and green mysteries,
who asked with a grave monotony
of the store next door to me
that I don’t like to think about,
because it’s just not for me,
“What’s in there?” the girl
all pinks and sweatpants,
wearing her smile like a saber,
lazily responded, destroying
both my moment and my ease:
“Beautiful diamonds and stuff.”

From “After Ringing Up Jena Swan”:

I

Her bright magenta pea coat
wraps tightly around her
frame like skin, skin whipping
around like raw flesh hanging
in flaps but youthful and fresh still
and being the best for everyone’s
eyes as a choice garment or cloth
blossom not matching her any
better than how it’s supposed to.

(read more here at In Memory of My Feelings)

Comments (2) »

So ya lookin’ for somethin’ to read . . .

Read this

On the other side of my wall a father yells at his child. The child yells back in healthy, though rebellious, unnerving discourse. With the window cracked open so slightly to let in the warm Winter air, perhaps the warmest evening of the season, I listen to a mix of psychedelic 70s pop straight out of West Africa. It slashes Latin grooves through the otherwise silent bedroom. I swear the blue walls are boogeying.

It’s been a strange journey out into the world of the non-academic, and it’s not the easiest one when you’re judging the entire literary canon that you face. When thinking about reading for pleasure, personal-development, or aesthetic appreciation, there are several ways to approach your next textual companion. You can go with your gut feeling, as my assistant manager at Borders does, and choose whatever feels right. You can go off a list or other minor-systematic device such as the latest recommendation or “hit” (2666 anyone?), or you can have another, more rational way to hit books that are both important and entertaining.

I was thinking about this third of the three basic options I’ve set forth (obviously with room for more expansion) above, and what possibly could be a organized way to approach a reading list. Anniversaries randomly fell into play, and so I started thinking: why not make anniversaries more relevant on a personal level? Why do organizations and corporations and schools get to celebrate and promote anniversaries when everyone else just kind of blindly follows them? Anniversaries should be just as personal as public. So I did some very light and mindless research (that really is a little more annoying on this fabulous Internet thing than one might expect!) and came up with the following books from some of the more standard anniversaries. Mind you, these are not lists of every book published, but rather books that I might actually consider reading throughout this year, letting the literature and history, these things that the modern philosophers say have taken over and have come to represent Death and thus God, and I am going with it. For now.

Also, I thought that I was putting these books in alphabetical order, but there’s some subjective ordering going on based on what I think is most important. It’s like a ghost in this 21st century machine.

1984: 25 Years Ago

There were some great publications released this year. Unfortunately I’ve already read the most notorious volume of them all, which should not need help identifying. Fortunately what many consider the best book of that year, the second title on the list, is a title I have not even heard of. Go figure. And an odd coincidence? J. Updike died this year and his most impressionable book was published in ‘84. Double whammy for me to get on his bandwagon. Also, was ‘84 a good year for sci-fi or what?

Fiction

  • So Long, and Thanks for All the Fish by Douglas Adams
  • Empire of the Sun by J. G. Ballard
  • Flaubert’s Parrot by Julian Barnes
  • The House on Mango Street by Sandra Cisneros
  • Love Medicine by Louise Erdritch
  • Neuromancer by William Gibson
  • The Unbearable Lightness of Being by Milan Kundera
  • Slow Learner: Early Stories by Thomas Pynchon
  • The Big U by Neal Stephenson (his debut novel)
  • Witches of Eastwick by John Updike

Poetry*

  • A Wave by John Ashbery**
  • The L=A=N=G=U=A=G=E Book by Charles Bernstein and Bruce Andrews
  • Book of Mercy by Leonard Cohen
  • The Dead and the Living by Sharon Olds
  • Secular Love by Michael Ondaatje
  • Selected Poems by Kenneth Rexroth
  • Differences for Four Hands by Rosmarie Waldrop

* I definitely was not able to find a comprehensive source for poetry published in this year.

** This title is probably the one I’m looking forward to reading the most; I must get through his “Three Poems” book I acquired at the Last Word Book Store over in West Phila the other day, though, which includes what Silliman calls his “most important poem,” which is of course, “the System.”

Nonfiction

  • Hackers: Heroes of the Computer Evolution by Steven Levy*

* Yeah–not definitive reading, but we’ve come a long way as a digital culture in the past 25 years, haven’t we? Sorry–brief moment of nostalgia, especially featuring images of free AOL disks being tossed around like free weaponry.

1959: 50 Years Ago

The CD has shifted over to my first listen of this Hungarian funk compilation, which is simply and frankly quite outstanding–if you can find it on Rapidshare or purchase it online, it’s completely worth it, and to think that something amazing goes on over in that country all the time, and we Americans rarely know about it!

Anyway, the turn of the decade that has definitely been one of the most profound influences on my youthful literary aspirations sees a lot of great literature published. I just finished reading Saul Bellow’s Herzog, came out a couple years previous, but my complications and pleasures that came out of it have lead me to an interest in pursuing what’s on the list by him; same with Roth. Maybe another go at Naked Lunch? I remember complete, and thorough, confusion when I read it the first time in High School. And it’s another good year for sci-fi fans. F’shame!

Fiction

  • Advertisement for Myself by Norman Mailer
  • Goodbye, Columbus by Philip Roth
  • Naked Lunch by William S. Burroughs
  • Starship Troopers by Robert Heinlein
  • Henderson the Rain King by Saul Bellow
  • The Tin Drum by Günter Grass
  • The Sirens of Titan by Kurt Vonnegut
  • And also, after a 31-year ban in the U.S. (that asshole!), Lady Chatterley’s Lover rejoins reading circles in all its enlightened, sexual glory. D. H. Lawrence definitely roaming the high hills.

Poetry

  • The Crow and the Heart by Hayden Carruth
  • The Crooked Lines of God by William Everson (i.e. Brother Antonius)
  • Kaddish by Allen Ginsberg*
  • Ko, or a Season on Earth by Kenneth Koch
  • With Eyes at the Back of Our Heads by Denise Levertov
  • Life Studies by Robert Lowell
  • O to Be a Dragon by Marianne Moore
  • Inscriptions: 1944-1956 by Charles Reznikoff**
  • Words for the Wind by Theodore Roethke
  • Advice to a Prophet and Other Poems by Richard Wilbur
  • Saint Judas by James Wright
  • A 1-12 by Louis Zukofsky***

* It’s probably about time you went back and read through this again, anyway, right?

** For a great article on some other work Reznikoff did concerning law records, check out this blog.

*** I know 1-9 was published in 1940, but seriously, is this ‘59 release getting enough coverage?

1909, 1859, and 1809

OK, so you do have a decent Gertrude Stein text in there (Three Lives) and sure, Charles Dickens’s A Tale of Two Cities in 1859 is definitely something to bat your musty lashes to, but seriously, the big winner, which you must’ve seen on the magazines (the few remaining prints you’ve got on the racks anymore) and all over the blogs: Darwin. Origin of Species was published way out in November of 1859. That’s the first edition. The one that started it all. Want to see the first handful of editions in the yellowed, pre-acid-free/pre-recycled paper glory? Go to UPenn’s library, and stroll down one of their hallways. They’ve got a setup right there for you. There’s also a huge event coming up on the 15th (They call it the Year of Evolution. Spooky. Click here for the info). Maybe it’s time I crack open my own Bantam edition. Maybe it’ll lead me to a sexual paradise.

Comments (1) »